Shaq not done with the Heat???

[The Dude]

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-29-42/The-Rarest-of-NBA-Treats--a-Game-Protest-is-Granted.html

Saw this originally on withleather.com....so how exactly will this work now that Shaq doesnt play for the Heat, especially since hes the central figure in the protest?

[WhyNotUs?]

The game will be replayed March 8th, it will be 114-111 Hawks, with 51.9 seconds left, and it will be Miami’s ball..

Guess they'll just have to do it with out the diesel...

[The Dude]

The game will be replayed March 8th, it will be 114-111 Hawks, with 51.9 seconds left, and it will be Miami’s ball..

Guess they'll just have to do it with out the diesel...


and thats the kicker!
If Shaq's not playing...whats the point of doing it, since it was his fouling out that was protested? They could just leave the outcome as it was, since it was an outcome that came without Shaq...

[USCya]

if neither are in the running for the playoffs would it really matter if they play it or not?

[acejrock]

they should do it for principle

[WhyNotUs?]

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/basketball/heat/sns-ap-bkn-heat-hawks-replay,0,3956798.story

O'Neal Trade Raises Questions for Replay


By CHARLES ODUM | AP Sports Writer 7:17 PM EST, February 6, 2008 http://m1.2mdn.net/viewad/817-grey.gif (http://ad.doubleclick.net/click;h=v8/3664/0/0/%2a/m;44306;0-0;0;12928737;21-88/31;0/0/0;;~okv=;ptype=s;slug=sns-ap-bkn-heat-hawks-replay;rg=ur;ref=googlecom;pos=1;sz=88x31;tile=2;~ sscs=%3f)

ATLANTA - Shaquille O'Neal is leaving some unfinished business behind in Atlanta as he heads to Phoenix.

The Atlanta Hawks and Miami Heat must replay the final 51.9 seconds of their Dec. 19 game in Atlanta on March 8, but now O'Neal won't be with Miami for the game.

O'Neal was traded to the Phoenix Suns on Wednesday. The deal sent four-time All-Star Shawn Marion and Marcus Banks to Miami, and thus the new question: Will the two new Miami players be eligible for the replay of the end of the Dec. 19 game?

"The league doesn't know. They'll have to make a determination," Hawks general manager Billy Knight said Wednesday night.

The replay is necessary because the Hawks' official scorer ruled incorrectly that O'Neal fouled out of the game.

The Hawks won 117-111 in overtime. Play will start from the time after O'Neal's disputed sixth foul, with the Hawks leading 114-111.

Knight said NBA officials brought up the possibility of an O'Neal trade when they announced last month that the end of the game must be replayed. Knight said he was told be officials last month that a decision would have to be made about the eligibility of any new Miami players if there was a trade.

The Hawks also were fined $50,000, with commissioner David Stern ruling the team was "grossly negligent" in failing to address the mistake.

The protest is the first granted by the NBA since December 1982, when then-NBA commissioner Larry O'Brien upheld a request for a replay by the San Antonio Spurs after their 137-132 double-overtime loss to the Los Angeles Lakers the previous month.

The Spurs and Lakers finally finished the game in April 1983, with San Antonio winning 117-114.

[The Dude]

Wait...so the Hawks were fined for a mistake by the official?
Was the official fined as well???

[WhyNotUs?]

Wait...so the Hawks were fined for a mistake by the official?
Was the official fined as well???

I think it was more so the Hawks score keepers fault... than the refs...