Originally Posted by Lalli25
You kept saying how great he was the first two years and to look at his stats proved it, but yet now when he has "mature" his stats are the worse but he is so much better. How does that even make sense? You can't argue to have it both ways. So which is it, was he overrated for 2 years and inflated stats or is he ok now but winning do to D?
It pretty clear to see the difference in the team is the D not Cam. They didn't beat the Saints because of Cam but because the D kept them in it until the O finally got a TD drive against an average D. It doesn't make the panthers a bad team that they rely on the D but just be honest about what makes them good.
You really should watch the games, you might learn something
Cam has 4 game winning drives this year: SF, NE, Mia, and NO
Yea, he is terrible