View Single Post
Old 01-17-2014, 11:29 PM   #6
rioninusc
Two Deep
 
rioninusc's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,236
CockyCash: 555
rioninusc rules the CockPitrioninusc rules the CockPitrioninusc rules the CockPitrioninusc rules the CockPitrioninusc rules the CockPitrioninusc rules the CockPitrioninusc rules the CockPitrioninusc rules the CockPitrioninusc rules the CockPitrioninusc rules the CockPitrioninusc rules the CockPit
Default Re: Separate division for SEC, Big Ten, ACC, Pac-12, Big 12

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReadR00ster View Post
The levels already exist. Some schools and conferences just don't want to accept that are not in the top tier. You might as well just make the levels more official to improve the competition. 50 - 0 games in the 3rd quarter do nothing for the sport.
Yep they were called BCS conferences, and then the rest. BCS got ranking privileges over the Non BCS schools. The new divisions should be FBS division 1 which would be the big 5, and FBS division 2 which would have the other 5 conferences. Each division will have their own playoff, but could bowl against each other. Nothing changes, but it's a fact Miami(OH) will rarely ever beat Miami(FL), or the top 10 teams in the nation.

Not to ReadRooster, but the people who thinks it's a bad move. Relax this will hardly change anything by how things are done now, the only difference is teams in the Sunbelt, AAC, Conf Usa, MWC, MAC will have their own playoff. Good move, and gives the smaller schools that are halfway decent a chance to win some championship trophy's, that they would never get the way it is now.
rioninusc is offline   Reply With Quote