View Single Post
Old 01-20-2014, 08:59 PM   #10
usc1
Class of 2013
 
usc1's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Columbia
Posts: 13,408
CockyCash: 200
usc1 is USC mascot materialusc1 is USC mascot materialusc1 is USC mascot materialusc1 is USC mascot materialusc1 is USC mascot materialusc1 is USC mascot materialusc1 is USC mascot materialusc1 is USC mascot materialusc1 is USC mascot materialusc1 is USC mascot materialusc1 is USC mascot material
Default Re: New Rivals 100 Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by CockTail View Post
None of these kids have played one ounce of meaningful football since the last rankings, so take it for what it is worth. Everything now is about adjusting the ranking of kids based on where they have committed, not about how good they are. How can one player move up and another fall when neither has played.

Player A must be better than player B because A is going to ALA and B is going to NCST. Take a look at the kids who moved up and then look at their committed school. All you need to know.

Or maybe it's because Alabama can get better players than NC State. You tell me which is more likely.
__________________
usc1 is online now