View Single Post
Old 02-14-2014, 01:02 PM   #6
ShutTheSuccop
Go Cocks!
 
ShutTheSuccop's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 7,554
CockyCash: 155567
ShutTheSuccop is USC mascot materialShutTheSuccop is USC mascot materialShutTheSuccop is USC mascot materialShutTheSuccop is USC mascot materialShutTheSuccop is USC mascot materialShutTheSuccop is USC mascot materialShutTheSuccop is USC mascot materialShutTheSuccop is USC mascot materialShutTheSuccop is USC mascot materialShutTheSuccop is USC mascot materialShutTheSuccop is USC mascot material
Default Re: Under Armour May Be Part of Olympic Dissappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamecock1983 View Post
If they tested them they still should have noticed that their times were down, or so it seems.

Admittedly, I'm talking out of my neck here...but I think we are way to quick to blame something on a small confounding variable. Meaning...sure it could be contributing, but prove it. It could also be subpar ice conditions, a bad lunch, fatigue (from carrying your toilet paper to the bin), any number of things.

I understand we are talking about precision athletes who need everything tip-top to reach their potential...but from what I've seen about the Sochi games, NOTHING is tip-top.

I agree 100%...it makes absolutely no sense to have not tested them adequately before using them on the worlds biggest stage...not a wise move IMO.
ShutTheSuccop is offline   Reply With Quote