SEC W-L vs top 25 teams..South Carolina leads

[superfly]

This is pretty impressive any way you look at it.

http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/po...er-ranked-foes


Below are the records for all 14 SEC teams over the past three seasons against teams that finished the season nationally ranked in one of the final polls. In parentheses are the records against top-10 foes.

1. South Carolina: 12-3, .800 (5-2)
2. Alabama: 8-4, .667 (4-4)
3. LSU: 9-5, .643 (6-5)
4. Texas A&M: 5-10, .333 (1-6)
5. Georgia: 5-11, .312 (2-9)
6. Florida: 5-12, .294 (3-7)
7. Auburn: 4-13, .235 (3-8)
8. Missouri: 3-12, .200 (0-8)
9. Arkansas: 2-11, .154 (1-8)
10. Ole Miss: 2-15, .118 (0-9)
10. Tennessee: 2-15, .118 (1-12)
12. Vanderbilt: 0-12, .000 (0-8)
13. Kentucky: 0-13, .000 (0-8)
14. Mississippi State: 0-15, .000 (0-9)

[carolinafan53186]

Originally Posted by superfly

This is pretty impressive any way you look at it.

http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/po...er-ranked-foes


Below are the records for all 14 SEC teams over the past three seasons against teams that finished the season nationally ranked in one of the final polls. In parentheses are the records against top-10 foes.

1. South Carolina: 12-3, .800 (5-2)
2. Alabama: 8-4, .667 (4-4)
3. LSU: 9-5, .643 (6-5)
4. Texas A&M: 5-10, .333 (1-6)
5. Georgia: 5-11, .312 (2-9)
6. Florida: 5-12, .294 (3-7)
7. Auburn: 4-13, .235 (3-8)
8. Missouri: 3-12, .200 (0-8)
9. Arkansas: 2-11, .154 (1-8)
10. Ole Miss: 2-15, .118 (0-9)
10. Tennessee: 2-15, .118 (1-12)
12. Vanderbilt: 0-12, .000 (0-8)
13. Kentucky: 0-13, .000 (0-8)
14. Mississippi State: 0-15, .000 (0-9)

You would think that Vandy would have gotten somebody in that time frame.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I847 using Tapatalk 2

[treys1986]

I saw that yesterday.

That really is an amazing statistic.

[CockySwede]

Very nice stats! Even more impressive looking at the top 10 stat. 5-2 against topp ten teams

[2000grad]

Ugh...we are one of ut's 2 wins

[Emery]

It's nice but stings a little too.

[jrussjr]

Originally Posted by Emery

It's nice but stings a little too.

Agree with you on that....just look at the allbarners in comparison

[ucan'tlickourcocks]

Are we there yet???

[jrussjr]

Originally Posted by ucan'tlickourcocks

Are we there yet???

"Just one or two more hills to go yet"

"....at least they don't look like mountains anymore"

[JoeMorrisonLives]

We're Tennessee's only victory over top 25 and Auburn's only win over a top ten not counting the two they picked up last season.

[CockyLifer]

Well this is a graphic I like us at the top of the SEC. One of the first of many.

[TheMule]

Originally Posted by ucan'tlickourcocks

Are we there yet???

When we learn to survive our brainfart game.

[weatheredxtown]

Almighty 'Bama seems to struggle with quality opponents huh

[Woody7687]

Originally Posted by weatheredxtown

Almighty 'Bama seems to struggle with quality opponents huh

By looking at this I would have to agree, but they have the burden of getting everyone's best game. Nobody fails to get up to play Bama. Now saying that I will say this they have been lucky the past 3 years with scheduling. I would take their rings over this stat any day though.

[OldPat]

Easy, guys, don't pop a blood vessel in your eyeballs scanning the horizon for a cloud. LOL.

[Spurrier_Superior_One]

How times have changed. I remember when beating ONE ranked team meant the world now we expect to win Top 25 games.

[CockyLifer]

Originally Posted by Spurrier_Superior_One

How times have changed. I remember when beating ONE ranked team meant the world now we expect to win Top 25 games.

No kidding. I remember when winning 6 was a big deal. Much less not getting blown away in a game was a win.

[4Runner]

Originally Posted by superfly

This is pretty impressive any way you look at it.

http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/po...er-ranked-foes


Below are the records for all 14 SEC teams over the past three seasons against teams that finished the season nationally ranked in one of the final polls. In parentheses are the records against top-10 foes.

1. South Carolina: 12-3, .800 (5-2)
2. Alabama: 8-4, .667 (4-4)
3. LSU: 9-5, .643 (6-5)
4. Texas A&M: 5-10, .333 (1-6)
5. Georgia: 5-11, .312 (2-9)
6. Florida: 5-12, .294 (3-7)
7. Auburn: 4-13, .235 (3-8)
8. Missouri: 3-12, .200 (0-8)
9. Arkansas: 2-11, .154 (1-8)
10. Ole Miss: 2-15, .118 (0-9)
10. Tennessee: 2-15, .118 (1-12)
12. Vanderbilt: 0-12, .000 (0-8)
13. Kentucky: 0-13, .000 (0-8)
14. Mississippi State: 0-15, .000 (0-9)

What is more "alarming" is how poor the overall records are for the all powerful SEC. I mean, only 3 teams with a winning record? Would have never guess that. Having typed that, I bet other conferences far much worse. Good post.

[superfly]

Originally Posted by 4Runner

What is more "alarming" is how poor the overall records are for the all powerful SEC. I mean, only 3 teams with a winning record? Would have never guess that. Having typed that, I bet other conferences far much worse. Good post.

When you consistently have 6 teams ranked in the top 25 then there are losses that are automatically built into your schedule. Those account for most of the bottom half losses.

[Spurrier_Superior_One]

Originally Posted by 4Runner

What is more "alarming" is how poor the overall records are for the all powerful SEC. I mean, only 3 teams with a winning record? Would have never guess that. Having typed that, I bet other conferences far much worse. Good post.

Don't forget there is a lot of ranked teams playing ranked teams LSU, Bama, Auburn, aTm, USC etc had losses to ranked SEC teams when they were ranked.