FSU takes $500K Hit for attending ACCCG

[I Bleed Garnet]

Originally Posted by Skeeter3

Actually it's 73,675.

There were just over 75,000 in attendance to witness the worst beating in SEC title game history when you played in it. I guess you got us there.

This year it was reported that there were 64,778 there.

There were not more than 64,000 people there.

[SamAdamsCockyAle]

Originally Posted by I Bleed Garnet

This year it was reported that there were 64,778 there.

There were not more than 64,000 people there.

Yeah they inflated that number by going off of ticket sales, there was no way that many people were there going by the empty seats and the upper deck sections which were covered by tarps.

[doc]

Originally Posted by Skeeter3

Actually it's 73,675.

There were just over 75,000 in attendance to witness the worst beating in SEC title game history when you played in it. I guess you got us there.

What was the Carolina/Clemson score that year.

But to get back to the orange bowl, it's a shame that two years
in a row, two good teams lose money going to a BCS bowl. That
is a situation that should be corrected.

[Todd803]

Originally Posted by Skeeter3

Actually it's 73,675.

There were just over 75,000 in attendance to witness the worst beating in SEC title game history when you played in it. I guess you got us there.

Which means USC didn't LOSE money by playing in the game. That was the point of the OP. Read -> Comprehend -> Use Logic -> Make Comment. If you are going to talk smack at least try and be good at it. Glad that you are watching out for FSU though. It's not Cockytalk's fault that the ACC is viewed as absolute garbage by most of the country, just play better football and maybe you won't be so upset.

[I Bleed Garnet]

Originally Posted by doc

What was the Carolina/Clemson score that year.

But to get back to the orange bowl, it's a shame that two years
in a row, two good teams lose money going to a BCS bowl. That
is a situation that should be corrected.

It will certainly change when the playoff comes.

When the orange bowl isn't used in the playoff it will be ACC vs SEC, Big Ten or ND.

You'd think fans would want to attend that game right?

[Skeeter3]

Originally Posted by Todd803

Which means USC didn't LOSE money by playing in the game. That was the point of the OP. Read -> Comprehend -> Use Logic -> Make Comment. If you are going to talk smack at least try and be good at it. Glad that you are watching out for FSU though. It's not Cockytalk's fault that the ACC is viewed as absolute garbage by most of the country, just play better football and maybe you won't be so upset.

The point of the OP is to somehow put down Clemson by making fun of a game we didn't even play in. Not to mention the only reason GT played in the game was because the two teams ahead of them weren't eligible. Obviously the OP didn't consider this or the thread never would have been started.

[Legalman72]

Haha at Skeeter having to go to history and other teams.

Skeeter...

Dabo.

ACC.

Game over.

[Skeeter3]

^^for the sake of your entire fanbase you should really consider banning this guy^^

[Schecter]

NM

[Legalman72]

It drives skeetr and taters CRAZY when we do the SEC thing.

Sorry skeetr, SEC all the way.

Taters aren't desired by any conference.

Ballgame.

[Skeeter3]

Originally Posted by Legalman72

It drives skeetr and taters CRAZY when we do the SEC thing.

Sorry skeetr, SEC all the way.

Taters aren't desired by any conference.

Ballgame.

If given the option we both know that the SEC would trade USCjr. for Clemson any day.

[Lant]

Looking at that chart. It would be better to go the third party route. Prices as low as $11

[zambam]

Originally Posted by Skeeter3

If given the option we both know that the SEC would trade USCjr. for Clemson any day.

Whatever helps you sleep at night, junior.

[BigSteven34]

Originally Posted by Skeeter3

If given the option we both know that the SEC would trade USCjr. for Clemson any day.

Go ask the LSU fans you are getting ready to face what they think. Tiger bait correctly thinks Clemson is a joke. You are stuck in a crappy conference from which you can't escape...deal with it.

[803scdantes]

Originally Posted by Skeeter3

Actually it's 73,675.

There were just over 75,000 in attendance to witness the worst beating in SEC title game history when you played in it. I guess you got us there.

How many people were present to watch SC beat clemson for the 4th straight year?

[SpecOps Cock]

It's still the ACC Vs Nobody. Who cares who free shoes play let them suffer for being in a Pu$$y conference !!!

[wholelottacock]

Love the Clemson douches on here spinning it all to Smack and Back.

[ucan'tlickourcocks]

After getting their @$$ kicked 4 years in a row, you think the pathetic Clempsux ACC Homers would just stay away!

[ACPhilson]

Originally Posted by Skeeter3

When Clemson played in the ACCCG it set the record for attendence. When SC played in the SECCG the record was set for margin of victory. You should all be proud.

70 dunce.

[MBGCock]

Originally Posted by Skeeter3

The point of the OP is to somehow put down Clemson by making fun of a game we didn't even play in. Not to mention the only reason GT played in the game was because the two teams ahead of them weren't eligible. Obviously the OP didn't consider this or the thread never would have been started.

who is obsessed with who now? Geez, Im laughing at the whole EZZ.