Based on the USA Today article, it looks like SEC schools will make

[Gamecock Stock]

$25 million annually for the regular season averaged over the contract duration
$1.5 million annually establishing a SEC Network
$7.1 from post-season (SEC championship, playoffs and bowls).

That totals to $33.6 million annually per SEC school. If the SEC gets 2 of the 4 playoff spots (we would have this year and probably will most often do so), that will be $6 million more (for the 2nd SEC school) for the SEC. That would mean an additional $400,000 for each SEC school, bringing the annual total to $34 million annually to Carolina. If a SEC team gets invited to the Orange Bowl to play the ACC rep, that will be an extra $1.8 million per SEC school. Remember we already have the Sugar Bowl locked up for the SEC and the Big 12. Each of those 2 conferences will get $40 million from the Sug.

Compare that to the ACC. The TV deal they recently signed, spread out over the contract period, would give each ACC school $17 million annually. When you include the differences in bowl arrangements and how many teams conferences send to the playoff, SEC schools are probably going to make about $10 million more annually from TV revenues alone, than ACC schools will.

I had read last year from a Texas A&M source that Slive told them that the SEC payouts would be $34 million annually per school. Now I know how that number was arrived at.

[Acockolypse Now]

$34 million a year.

DANG.

[Cocknfire55]

U jelly Clemson?

[I Bleed Garnet]

Can someone bring up the numbers for the other 3 conferences?
(PAC12, Big12, Big10)

[LegalCock]

Will we still get to keep lots of stuff to sell to like fox sports carolinas or is that all going to the SEC network? Because that was another key advantage over the ACC contract. They had to give more football rights, which enraged FSU because they could sell that stuff to sunshine network for good $$$. I personally would watch lots of SEC baseball on the SEC network too if the coverage was good to decent. They aren't getting full value out of baseball right now imop.

[trapper82]

Originally Posted by Gamecock Stock

$25 million annually for the regular season averaged over the contract duration
$1.5 million annually establishing a SEC Network
$7.1 from post-season (SEC championship, playoffs and bowls).

That totals to $33.6 million annually per SEC school. If the SEC gets 2 of the 4 playoff spots (we would have this year and probably will most often do so), that will be $6 million more (for the 2nd SEC school) for the SEC. That would mean an additional $400,000 for each SEC school, bringing the annual total to $34 million annually to Carolina. If a SEC team gets invited to the Orange Bowl to play the ACC rep, that will be an extra $1.8 million per SEC school. Remember we already have the Sugar Bowl locked up for the SEC and the Big 12. Each of those 2 conferences will get $40 million from the Sug.

Compare that to the ACC. The TV deal they recently signed, spread out over the contract period, would give each ACC school $17 million annually. When you include the differences in bowl arrangements and how many teams conferences send to the playoff, SEC schools are probably going to make about $10 million more annually from TV revenues alone, than ACC schools will.

I had read last year from a Texas A&M source that Slive told them that the SEC payouts would be $34 million annually per school. Now I know how that number was arrived at.

And that my friends is one of the things will set us up for long term domination of the tiggers. The next shoe to fall for us to take another big step in recruiting is for them to fall flat on their face while we get all the in-state talent we want instead of splitting it like we do now. It's coming sooner than most people think.

[I Bleed Garnet]

Originally Posted by LegalCock

Will we still get to keep lots of stuff to sell to like fox sports carolinas or is that all going to the SEC network? Because that was another key advantage over the ACC contract. They had to give more football rights, which enraged FSU because they could sell that stuff to sunshine network for good $$$. I personally would watch lots of SEC baseball on the SEC network too if the coverage was good to decent. They aren't getting full value out of baseball right now imop.

Yea but college baseball doesn't pull in great ratings.
I'm only basing this off the CWS doing poorly every year

[LegalCock]

Maryland projected $32 million next season but $43 million after renegotiating contracts in 2017; they compared that to a $20 million estimate for the next two seasons when they decided to say peace out. Big 12 numbers are almost meaningless because they are not standardized.

[LegalCock]

Originally Posted by I Bleed Garnet

Yea but college baseball doesn't pull in great ratings.
I'm only basing this off the CWS doing poorly every year

No doubt. All relative but SEC conference match-ups would develop a viewership over time. Lots of good programs to hype. I'm talking better than say world strongest man competitions.

[LegalCock]

I'm not impressed with those numbers that OP is throwing out there. Especially if that is including the bowl money including the new champions bowl. We should be smoking the big 10 just given the demographics not to mention the viewership. Alumni base is not really a relevant metric.

[I Bleed Garnet]

Originally Posted by LegalCock

Maryland projected $32 million next season but $43 million after renegotiating contracts in 2017; they compared that to a $20 million estimate for the next two seasons when they decided to say peace out. Big 12 numbers are almost meaningless because they are not standardized.

The big 12 adopted equal revenue sharing.
Once the conference lost A&M and got rid of Bebe they changed their revenue sharing.

[SwimCock]

Originally Posted by Gamecock Stock

$25 million annually for the regular season averaged over the contract duration
$1.5 million annually establishing a SEC Network
$7.1 from post-season (SEC championship, playoffs and bowls).

That totals to $33.6 million annually per SEC school. If the SEC gets 2 of the 4 playoff spots (we would have this year and probably will most often do so), that will be $6 million more (for the 2nd SEC school) for the SEC. That would mean an additional $400,000 for each SEC school, bringing the annual total to $34 million annually to Carolina. If a SEC team gets invited to the Orange Bowl to play the ACC rep, that will be an extra $1.8 million per SEC school. Remember we already have the Sugar Bowl locked up for the SEC and the Big 12. Each of those 2 conferences will get $40 million from the Sug.

Compare that to the ACC. The TV deal they recently signed, spread out over the contract period, would give each ACC school $17 million annually. When you include the differences in bowl arrangements and how many teams conferences send to the playoff, SEC schools are probably going to make about $10 million more annually from TV revenues alone, than ACC schools will.

I had read last year from a Texas A&M source that Slive told them that the SEC payouts would be $34 million annually per school. Now I know how that number was arrived at.

Remember that the EZZ contract is backloaded so they will get less money in earlier years, while we will be raking in a much bigger gap. That is a lot of the reason why FSU was so pissed off.

[I Bleed Garnet]

Originally Posted by LegalCock

I'm not impressed with those numbers that OP is throwing out there. Especially if that is including the bowl money including the new champions bowl. We should be smoking the big 10 just given the demographics not to mention the viewership. Alumni base is not really a relevant metric.

The big ten will have Chicago, DC and NY in their footprint with all the new additions.
That's probably why the Big Ten's will be greater.

[Gamecock Stock]

Originally Posted by LegalCock

I'm not impressed with those numbers that OP is throwing out there. Especially if that is including the bowl money including the new champions bowl. We should be smoking the big 10 just given the demographics not to mention the viewership. Alumni base is not really a relevant metric.

One thing to keep in mind is that the dollar goes a lot further in the South than in the Midwest. The cost-of-living is less down South. Heck drive up to Ohio and see the higher cost for gas. The cost for construction is lower. Lots of Northerners retire here with that being the reason.

[DiamondGamecock]

Originally Posted by I Bleed Garnet

The big ten will have Chicago, DC and NY in their footprint with all the new additions.
That's probably why the Big Ten's will be greater.

I'm going to doubt you on this one.

[I Bleed Garnet]

Originally Posted by DiamondGamecock

I'm going to doubt you on this one.

I'm talking about the Network deals.
Not the per year average.

[GregoryHouse]

Originally Posted by trapper82

And that my friends is one of the things will set us up for long term domination of the tiggers. The next shoe to fall for us to take another big step in recruiting is for them to fall flat on their face while we get all the in-state talent we want instead of splitting it like we do now. It's coming sooner than most people think.

What reasons do you believe will flip recruiting in our favor? I have some thoughts but want to hear what you think.

[sc455]

Post the link..

[trapper82]

Originally Posted by GH

What reasons do you believe will flip recruiting in our favor? I have some thoughts but want to hear what you think.

1. Morris leaves, they go back to horrid offense. This causes them to drop some games they have been winning on points alone.

2. They won't stand losing to us much longer and will fire Dabo. My guess, its when we hit 6 in a row. One thing he does well is recruit, and it takes an immediate dive.

3. Meanwhile we continue having better facilities because of the extra money. They all converge to make a big fall from clemsons current recruiting hauls.

[uscsandstorm85]

MONEY!!!!!!!!