Did Bleacher Get it Wrong? - Page 2

Gamecock Rob · 02-01-2013, 11:25 PM

Bleacher is the homeless mans SB Nation. And that's coming from a person who's cousin writes for Bleacher sometimes.

uscsandstorm85 · 02-02-2013, 01:11 AM

I hope we get TAMU. It's time to shuffle things around.

BeatBamaTwice · 02-02-2013, 02:01 AM

I guess I arrived at CockyTalk too late to understand the ban. Frankly, I've enjoyed scores of Bleacher Gamecock articles over the past couple of years, a few that I wished I could have shared links to here on CT.

803scdantes · 02-02-2013, 02:16 AM

I thought I read somewhere that the ban was lifted.

USCBASEBALL1 · 02-02-2013, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uscsandstorm85

I hope we get TAMU. It's time to shuffle things around.

I imagine it would help SC's recruiting in Texas if they decided to recruit that area.

JTsecSC · 02-02-2013, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by USCBASEBALL1

I imagine it would help SC's recruiting in Texas if they decided to recruit that area.

I'd like to 'tap that'.

OfficeLinebackerCock · 02-02-2013, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirBigSpur

I lost all respect for Bleacher Report when they said Williams Brice was the 66th nice stadium in college football, and Memorial Stadium (Clemson) was the #1 nicest stadium.

I dunno.....in a way "Mammorial" Stadium has been pretty good to us lately. We've had our way with the Tigs up there (as well as at home) and I kinda LIKE playing in the ole "death valley"....I wonder if they've put up a tombstone for the 2012, and 2010 Clem teams that lost to us up there. :-)

yazoo · 02-03-2013, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OfficeLinebackerCock

I dunno.....in a way "Mammorial" Stadium has been pretty good to us lately. We've had our way with the Tigs up there (as well as at home) and I kinda LIKE playing in the fake "death valley"....I wonder if they've put up a tombstone for the 2012, and 2010 Clem teams that lost to us up there. :-)

Fixed it for you.

M.C. · 02-04-2013, 12:17 AM

That site is wrong 99% of the time

Slacker USC · 02-04-2013, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acockolypse Now

Bleacher Report isn't a sports website.

It's an ad server that uses a bunch of homers to publish link bait in the hopes that someone will click on one of their pop ups.

This.

It's a terrible site, and just because it occasionally has a decent article doesn't make up for the fact that most of what it publishes is un-verified, un-edited tripe.

Slacker USC · 02-04-2013, 12:09 PM

If we allowed every idiotic Cockytalk poster to publish their opinion posts as "articles" spread out over dozens of slides, we'd have a close approximation of Bleacher Report.

BlueHerons · 02-04-2013, 04:27 PM

For the most part I really dislike BR. Bad articles written by people who generally don't have a clue. I do like Alex Roberts who is the lead Gamecock writer but that is about it. Brett Salle, that SEC hack, is ignorant on a lot of SEC stuff. He'll write articles without bothering to check facts.

Today's Top 10
Posters (by posts)	Threads (by views)	Newest Posts	Gamecock Headlines
GeoCocky66 Three and Out Spur's Addiction carolina_corpsman Captain9Dragons gotrice? TaySC ConwayGamecock TRBTB womfalcs3	Wilder and Thompson (1505) College Football Is (871) 2019 - Zovon Lindsay (668) Woman cuts off man's (517) Quincey Guerrier (473) TRANSFER PRANK: NFL (422) Scientists: Uranus S (282)	Muschamp Interview Rakym Felder 2019 - Chris Steele Discussion: 2019 Recruiti Fried Green Tomato Hornwo Elite 11 doesn't matter Landon Powell 39-6 at NGU **USC (23-17) vs. Furman College Football Is Comin Wilder and Thompson trans

02-01-2013, 11:25 PM	#21
Gamecock Rob Household Name Male Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Wilmington, NC, America Posts: 7,397 CockyCash: 5200	Re: Did Bleacher Get it Wrong? Bleacher is the homeless mans SB Nation. And that's coming from a person who's cousin writes for Bleacher sometimes.

02-02-2013, 01:11 AM	#22
uscsandstorm85 2nd Team All-SEC Male Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Anywhere USC is playing. Posts: 3,096 CockyCash: 500	Re: Did Bleacher Get it Wrong? I hope we get TAMU. It's time to shuffle things around.

02-02-2013, 02:01 AM	#23
BeatBamaTwice Yes we can!!! Male Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Goose Creek Posts: 3,166 CockyCash: 179999999908811015	Re: Did Bleacher Get it Wrong? I guess I arrived at CockyTalk too late to understand the ban. Frankly, I've enjoyed scores of Bleacher Gamecock articles over the past couple of years, a few that I wished I could have shared links to here on CT.

02-02-2013, 02:16 AM	#24
803scdantes 2nd Team All-SEC Male Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Northeast Columbia Posts: 3,043 CockyCash: 5200	Re: Did Bleacher Get it Wrong? I thought I read somewhere that the ban was lifted. __________________ 34-17; 29-7; 34-13; 27-17; 31-17

02-04-2013, 12:17 AM	#29
M.C. Gamecock4Life Male Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Denver, NC Posts: 13,856 CockyCash: 8949643	Re: Did Bleacher Get it Wrong? That site is wrong 99% of the time __________________ All you Clemson Tigers Can Kiss My Garnet Ass -M.C.

02-04-2013, 12:09 PM	#31
Slacker USC OG Male Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Columbia, SC Posts: 1,358 CockyCash: 705	Re: Did Bleacher Get it Wrong? If we allowed every idiotic Cockytalk poster to publish their opinion posts as "articles" spread out over dozens of slides, we'd have a close approximation of Bleacher Report. __________________ Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.

02-04-2013, 04:27 PM	#32
BlueHerons Blue Chip Female Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Florida Posts: 653 CockyCash: 200	Re: Did Bleacher Get it Wrong? For the most part I really dislike BR. Bad articles written by people who generally don't have a clue. I do like Alex Roberts who is the lead Gamecock writer but that is about it. Brett Salle, that SEC hack, is ignorant on a lot of SEC stuff. He'll write articles without bothering to check facts.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode