|
|
|
|
Welcome to Cockytalk! Thank you for visiting our forum. As a guest, you have limited access to view some discussion and articles. By joining our free community, you will be able to view all discussions and articles, post your own topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos, participate in Pick'Em contests and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today!! If you have any problems registering or logging in, please contact our Admins. Thanks! |
|
|||||||
| Today's Top 10 | |||
| Posters (by posts) | Threads (by views) | Newest Posts |  Gamecock Headlines  |
|
|
| ||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-01-2013, 11:08 AM
|
#1 |
|
Blue Chip
Male Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brevard, NC
Posts: 988
CockyCash: 500   |
Productive vs. Non-productive
If you look at the box score from the game last night, you will see that Brenton Williams and BRich were much more productive statistically than were Ellington and Smith, and yet Ellington and Smith each played more than twice the minutes(32) that Williams and BRich each played(15). I am trying to understand why Frank would play unproductive players so much more than productive ones. Does anyone have a theory?
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode
