CockyTalk

Welcome to Cockytalk!

Thank you for visiting our forum. As a guest, you have limited access to view some discussion and articles. By joining our free community, you will be able to view all discussions and articles, post your own topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos, participate in Pick'Em contests and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today!!

If you have any problems registering or logging in, please contact our Admins. Thanks!

Go Back   CockyTalk > Other Sports > The Locker Room

Today's Top 10
Posters (by posts)Threads (by views)Newest Posts Gamecock Headlines 
CockyLifer
The Yancey
IBleedGarnetandBlack
ReadR00ster
Spurticus
StormOfTalons
ZenUSC
gamecock88
HeadCockFan
M.C.
Nick Chubb (6385)
A&M on 3rd down (1639)
All of our defensive (1354)
Spurrier Presser (1292)
Uniform thread (1080)
Cack's Toast of the (1038)
louisville (1020)
Rankings (891)
Spurrier: Davis Will (812)
3-4 "D" Ke (601)
Not a talent issue
USC/Georgia 9/13/2014
3-4 "D" Keep it
Defensive Backfield
Nick Chubb
Spurrier: Davis Will Be A
Rankings
Jets Cut Tajh Boyd
2015 - Amonte Caban
Cack's Toast of the Game:


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2014, 04:19 AM   #21
brat
1st Team All-SEC
 
brat's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lexington
Posts: 3,564
CockyCash: 100500
brat is USC mascot materialbrat is USC mascot materialbrat is USC mascot materialbrat is USC mascot materialbrat is USC mascot materialbrat is USC mascot materialbrat is USC mascot materialbrat is USC mascot materialbrat is USC mascot materialbrat is USC mascot materialbrat is USC mascot material
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

Much of what needs to be said has been said, but...............

You already have the ACC ready to select the teams that play for their championship instead of letting the true divisional leaders play for it. Why?
Besides usually having poor crowds and the big names not always playing, they are trying to stack the deck to get at least one team in the final four playoff, annually. Could you have imagined if Duke beat FSU last year?

Now they want to beef up their schedule using the SEC. Besides their being able to use tie in as another recruiting ploy...."only our best teams will play for the ACC Championship and you get to play ND some years (not a ACC football member), but you will get to play a SEC team yearly", this is a no win scenario for the SEC. As always, we are suppose to win. If we lose, then you'll hear that the SEC is not so good, after all...more recruiting benefit. What few recruits know or ACC fans admit, is often the ACC will go weeks before a truly tough game. Duke, UVA, BC, WF, GT, NCSU and others do not constitute a rough stretch for them, so by the time they play a SEC team, we will have faced a tougher road, by far. Essentially, they often have an advantage of wear and tear.

Yes, we should win against ACC teams, but we need to have at least two breathers a year. By SEC standards, the ACC is a breather, but I mean we need the kind we win by showing up. Against the ACC, you have to ward off their best shot as they will always be jacked, while many SEC teams will often not have the same excitement in return.

As for us, we already play Clempson. That is plenty. If we are unfortunate enough to play one in a bowl game, well, we can't avoid a ho hum opponent.

The ACC is poorly run, the less contact we have with those clowns, the better. They are still afraid to stand up to UNC over the worst student-athlete scam in history. Let them play with themselves. Literally.
__________________
"When I was young I looked like Al Capone, but I lacked his compassion." - Oscar Lavant
brat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 05:09 AM   #22
FearThethumbandDJ
Starter
 
FearThethumbandDJ's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,415
CockyCash: 1000
FearThethumbandDJ rules the CockPitFearThethumbandDJ rules the CockPitFearThethumbandDJ rules the CockPitFearThethumbandDJ rules the CockPitFearThethumbandDJ rules the CockPitFearThethumbandDJ rules the CockPitFearThethumbandDJ rules the CockPitFearThethumbandDJ rules the CockPitFearThethumbandDJ rules the CockPitFearThethumbandDJ rules the CockPitFearThethumbandDJ rules the CockPit
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

The big question is how would this benefit us? Why the **** would we want to help the a she she
FearThethumbandDJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 10:19 AM   #23
gocockswyn
Starter
 
gocockswyn's Avatar
 
Female

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Greenville, sc
Posts: 1,321
CockyCash: 500
gocockswyn is crowing loudlygocockswyn is crowing loudlygocockswyn is crowing loudlygocockswyn is crowing loudlygocockswyn is crowing loudlygocockswyn is crowing loudlygocockswyn is crowing loudlygocockswyn is crowing loudlygocockswyn is crowing loudlygocockswyn is crowing loudlygocockswyn is crowing loudly
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

Don't see a benefit for us. Better to let them stay playing their ACC schedule as is.
gocockswyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 11:02 AM   #24
yazoo
1st Team All-SEC
 
yazoo's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tryon, NC
Posts: 4,129
CockyCash: 1813
yazoo is USC mascot materialyazoo is USC mascot materialyazoo is USC mascot materialyazoo is USC mascot materialyazoo is USC mascot materialyazoo is USC mascot materialyazoo is USC mascot materialyazoo is USC mascot materialyazoo is USC mascot materialyazoo is USC mascot materialyazoo is USC mascot material
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

Quote:
Originally Posted by brat View Post
Much of what needs to be said has been said, but...............

You already have the ACC ready to select the teams that play for their championship instead of letting the true divisional leaders play for it. Why?
Besides usually having poor crowds and the big names not always playing, they are trying to stack the deck to get at least one team in the final four playoff, annually. Could you have imagined if Duke beat FSU last year?

Now they want to beef up their schedule using the SEC. Besides their being able to use tie in as another recruiting ploy...."only our best teams will play for the ACC Championship and you get to play ND some years (not a ACC football member), but you will get to play a SEC team yearly", this is a no win scenario for the SEC. As always, we are suppose to win. If we lose, then you'll hear that the SEC is not so good, after all...more recruiting benefit. What few recruits know or ACC fans admit, is often the ACC will go weeks before a truly tough game. Duke, UVA, BC, WF, GT, NCSU and others do not constitute a rough stretch for them, so by the time they play a SEC team, we will have faced a tougher road, by far. Essentially, they often have an advantage of wear and tear.

Yes, we should win against ACC teams, but we need to have at least two breathers a year. By SEC standards, the ACC is a breather, but I mean we need the kind we win by showing up. Against the ACC, you have to ward off their best shot as they will always be jacked, while many SEC teams will often not have the same excitement in return.

As for us, we already play Clempson. That is plenty. If we are unfortunate enough to play one in a bowl game, well, we can't avoid a ho hum opponent.

The ACC is poorly run, the less contact we have with those clowns, the better. They are still afraid to stand up to UNC over the worst student-athlete scam in history. Let them play with themselves. Literally.
I totally agree with you. Many of the SEC teams that have an ACC rival agree with you also. I don't see us, UGA, UF, or UK agreeing that the conference should form some kind of alliance with the ACC. A better fit for the SEC is the Big 12.

The reasoning of HOW AN SEC-BIG XII SCHEDULING ALLIANCE COULD DOOM THE ACC is very persuasive as to why we need to bury the ACC.

Quote:
Meanwhile, the ACC is working feverishly to protect itself from further raids. You can be certain John Swofford is putting in more calls to Bowlsby than vice versa. But if you’re the SEC or Big XII, why throw his conference a life vest? Especially if the Big XII has its eyes on Florida State and Notre Dame (it does) and if the SEC has been wooing North Carolina and Duke for years (an ACC source told The Sporting News that it has).

Our SEC sources have told us since the addition of Missouri and Texas A&M that the league does not want to expand further. But if the league feels it must expand further, well, that change things. If the Big XII feels it must grow, too, then that’s two leagues with one goal. Might they work in concert — and we’re talking about more than a scheduling alliance here — to topple a rival conference and then pick its bones clean?
__________________


Shaq Attack
yazoo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 11:52 AM   #25
GH
Moonocababa
 
GH's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 18,697
CockyCash: 28000
GH is USC mascot materialGH is USC mascot materialGH is USC mascot materialGH is USC mascot materialGH is USC mascot materialGH is USC mascot materialGH is USC mascot materialGH is USC mascot materialGH is USC mascot materialGH is USC mascot materialGH is USC mascot material
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

Souls in hell want ice water
__________________
Yech, I can hear you misspelling words as you speak!
GH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2014, 06:48 PM   #26
b381l
Heisman Winner
 
b381l's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 22,330
CockyCash: 52205
b381l is USC mascot materialb381l is USC mascot materialb381l is USC mascot materialb381l is USC mascot materialb381l is USC mascot materialb381l is USC mascot materialb381l is USC mascot materialb381l is USC mascot materialb381l is USC mascot materialb381l is USC mascot materialb381l is USC mascot material
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

I don't have a problem with playing teams in the ACC, but we need to get the larger share of pot. There's no way I agree with a 50-50 split except FSU. Once the SEC goes to a 9 game conference schedule, that will all but eliminate any games between the SEC and ACC except our game with the taters or other rivalry games.
b381l is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2014, 06:54 PM   #27
kingoftheroost
la-la-la
 
kingoftheroost's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 3,834
CockyCash: 1000000
kingoftheroost is USC mascot materialkingoftheroost is USC mascot materialkingoftheroost is USC mascot materialkingoftheroost is USC mascot materialkingoftheroost is USC mascot materialkingoftheroost is USC mascot materialkingoftheroost is USC mascot materialkingoftheroost is USC mascot materialkingoftheroost is USC mascot materialkingoftheroost is USC mascot materialkingoftheroost is USC mascot material
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

Quote:
Originally Posted by b381l View Post
I don't have a problem with playing teams in the ACC, but we need to get the larger share of pot. There's no way I agree with a 50-50 split except FSU. Once the SEC goes to a 9 game conference schedule, that will all but eliminate any games between the SEC and ACC except our game with the taters or other rivalry games.
I'm afraid a certain school, "done smoked it," so we won't be getting any of the pot.
__________________
kingoftheroost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2014, 07:34 PM   #28
GarnetSwarm1990
Starter
 
GarnetSwarm1990's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,269
CockyCash: 738
GarnetSwarm1990 has developed his gaff and talonsGarnetSwarm1990 has developed his gaff and talonsGarnetSwarm1990 has developed his gaff and talonsGarnetSwarm1990 has developed his gaff and talonsGarnetSwarm1990 has developed his gaff and talonsGarnetSwarm1990 has developed his gaff and talonsGarnetSwarm1990 has developed his gaff and talonsGarnetSwarm1990 has developed his gaff and talonsGarnetSwarm1990 has developed his gaff and talonsGarnetSwarm1990 has developed his gaff and talonsGarnetSwarm1990 has developed his gaff and talons
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFC 5 1981 View Post
FSU added some heavyweights on their 2014 schedule (OK ST and ND). If FL rebounds, CU, Louisville (and possibly Miami) remain in the top 25; their schedule will be tough enough to pass muster (if they win them all).
You consider Ok State and ND heavyweights? That must be why the ACC thinks so highly of themselves. Those 2 teams are upper middle class at best. OK state can't play physical football which is why they run an extreme spread and count on turnovers on defense, and ND is ALWAYS overrated.

Forgive me if you are not a clemson fan but that resembles tater logic quite a bit.
GarnetSwarm1990 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2014, 08:01 PM   #29
GamecockSuperFan
Run the damn ball
 
GamecockSuperFan's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Spartanburg SC
Posts: 4,074
CockyCash: 200
GamecockSuperFan is USC mascot materialGamecockSuperFan is USC mascot materialGamecockSuperFan is USC mascot materialGamecockSuperFan is USC mascot materialGamecockSuperFan is USC mascot materialGamecockSuperFan is USC mascot materialGamecockSuperFan is USC mascot materialGamecockSuperFan is USC mascot materialGamecockSuperFan is USC mascot materialGamecockSuperFan is USC mascot materialGamecockSuperFan is USC mascot material
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

Quote:
Originally Posted by USCfootball View Post
I would like to see USC vs. UNC on a yearly basis
UNC as the opener, Clemson as the closer. Not a bad idea.
GamecockSuperFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2014, 08:16 PM   #30
ucan'tlickourcocks
The "other" M. Lattimore
 
ucan'tlickourcocks's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Myrtle Beach
Posts: 12,607
CockyCash: 991000000
ucan'tlickourcocks is USC mascot materialucan'tlickourcocks is USC mascot materialucan'tlickourcocks is USC mascot materialucan'tlickourcocks is USC mascot materialucan'tlickourcocks is USC mascot materialucan'tlickourcocks is USC mascot materialucan'tlickourcocks is USC mascot materialucan'tlickourcocks is USC mascot materialucan'tlickourcocks is USC mascot materialucan'tlickourcocks is USC mascot materialucan'tlickourcocks is USC mascot material
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

Quote:
Originally Posted by USCfootball View Post
I would like to see USC vs. UNC on a yearly basis
I would in Baseball...... only because I am STILL seething from our last game!
__________________
ucan'tlickourcocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2014, 08:48 PM   #31
bigdawg77
GOOOOO GEORGIA BULLDOGS
 
bigdawg77's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Angelo, Tx
Posts: 8,203
CockyCash: 7461220
bigdawg77 is USC mascot materialbigdawg77 is USC mascot materialbigdawg77 is USC mascot materialbigdawg77 is USC mascot materialbigdawg77 is USC mascot materialbigdawg77 is USC mascot materialbigdawg77 is USC mascot materialbigdawg77 is USC mascot materialbigdawg77 is USC mascot materialbigdawg77 is USC mascot materialbigdawg77 is USC mascot material
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

SEC East play the ACC and the SEC West play the Big 12,

East Games
GA-GT
SC-CU
UF-FSU
UK-UL
UT-VT
VU-Wake
Mizzou-UNC
__________________
bigdawg77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2014, 08:52 PM   #32
JaxcockFL
Cunning Linquist
 
JaxcockFL's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 8,303
CockyCash: 104965
JaxcockFL is USC mascot materialJaxcockFL is USC mascot materialJaxcockFL is USC mascot materialJaxcockFL is USC mascot materialJaxcockFL is USC mascot materialJaxcockFL is USC mascot materialJaxcockFL is USC mascot materialJaxcockFL is USC mascot materialJaxcockFL is USC mascot materialJaxcockFL is USC mascot materialJaxcockFL is USC mascot material
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

Screw UNC. If we want to play a school known for cheating, let's just play SMU.
__________________
JaxcockFL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2014, 09:15 PM   #33
TAFC 5 1981
Blue Chip
 
TAFC 5 1981's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: SC
Posts: 795
CockyCash: 500
TAFC 5 1981 is USC mascot materialTAFC 5 1981 is USC mascot materialTAFC 5 1981 is USC mascot materialTAFC 5 1981 is USC mascot materialTAFC 5 1981 is USC mascot materialTAFC 5 1981 is USC mascot materialTAFC 5 1981 is USC mascot materialTAFC 5 1981 is USC mascot materialTAFC 5 1981 is USC mascot materialTAFC 5 1981 is USC mascot materialTAFC 5 1981 is USC mascot material
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

Quote:
Originally Posted by GarnetSwarm1990 View Post
You consider Ok State and ND heavyweights? That must be why the ACC thinks so highly of themselves. Those 2 teams are upper middle class at best. OK state can't play physical football which is why they run an extreme spread and count on turnovers on defense, and ND is ALWAYS overrated.

Forgive me if you are not a clemson fan but that resembles tater logic quite a bit.
Tater logic or not, OK ST in not a sure win, and yes ND is often overrated; but beat them and that overrating works in your favor.
__________________
If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?
TAFC 5 1981 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2014, 02:01 PM   #34
B-G
Bowl MVP
 
B-G's Avatar
 
Male

Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wall Street
Posts: 2,108
CockyCash: 500
B-G rules the CockPitB-G rules the CockPitB-G rules the CockPitB-G rules the CockPitB-G rules the CockPitB-G rules the CockPitB-G rules the CockPitB-G rules the CockPitB-G rules the CockPitB-G rules the CockPitB-G rules the CockPit
Default Re: The ACC wants a scheduling agreement with the SEC

Ok State and ND are heavyweights and great teams to have on a schedule.
__________________
#TeamAPilgrim
B-G is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Provided by SLB Development