NCAA: Hit Defenseless Player Above Shoulders, Ejection.

ColaCock · 03-08-2013, 09:02 AM

Plus a 15 yard penalty.

Now, I am all for player safety. However, this past season proved that the referees are not able to accurately call this penalty correctly. We are going to rely on this same judgment for the ejection of a player from a game?

Totally the wrong way to handle it.

davidmc467 · 03-08-2013, 09:08 AM

The refs are able to use instant replay to review the ejection.

It is still a stupid rule, but at least they put the review in it.

usc1 · 03-08-2013, 09:11 AM

I don't think I can trust then even with the review.

uscsandstorm85 · 03-08-2013, 12:02 PM

Instant replay will not increase the accuracy. This rule needs a solid line that the refs have to go by when making a decision. The problem with this rule is every ref has a different view of what's above the shoulders, leading with the helmet, what constitutes a defenseless player, ect. While they have guidelines about those situations, there is still to much room for personal perception of what happened.

ReadR00ster · 03-08-2013, 12:19 PM

I don't think it's fair that they don't take into account that the defender might be a lot taller than "defenseless" offensive player, like Clowney and Vincent Smith (albeit not a defenseless player in that case.)

2000grad · 03-08-2013, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReadR00ster

I don't think it's fair that they don't take into account that the defender might be a lot taller than "defenseless" offensive player, like Clowney and Vincent Smith (albeit not a defenseless player in that case.)

1. Clowney hit was not helmet to helmet
2. Clowney hit was not above the shoulders

FanofCarolina1 · 03-08-2013, 12:46 PM

I still can't believe the hit on Cunningham in the Vandy game, yet that guy wasn't ejected.

But DJ's hit caused him to be ejected.

Maybe the instant replay on this will be a good thing. We'll see.

BornCocky'86 · 03-08-2013, 12:47 PM

The game we love is slowly fading away.
Only on the most egregious plays should ejections occur

Seriously, c'mon man.

StretfordEnd · 03-08-2013, 12:56 PM

The rule and the penalty are both stupid.

StretfordEnd · 03-08-2013, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FanofCarolina1

I still can't believe the hit on Cunningham in the Vandy game, yet that guy wasn't ejected.

But DJ's hit caused him to be ejected.

Maybe the instant replay on this will be a good thing. We'll see.

+1

I love how the defender for Alabama was able to absolutely level Aaron Murray, yet nothing happened to him.

ReadR00ster · 03-08-2013, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2000grad

1. Clowney hit was not helmet to helmet
2. Clowney hit was not above the shoulders

the top of Clowney's helmet hit Smith's facemask. That helmet does fly off otherwise. The reason why it's not a penalty is because he is not a defenseless player, he is a ball-carrier.

ReadR00ster · 03-08-2013, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FanofCarolina1

I still can't believe the hit on Cunningham in the Vandy game, yet that guy wasn't ejected.

But DJ's hit caused him to be ejected.

Maybe the instant replay on this will be a good thing. We'll see.

Swearinger was not ejected, he was suspended for the next game after fulll review, which would be a better policy for the NCAA to implement.

usc90grad · 03-08-2013, 01:07 PM

Going to ruin the game like the NFL is.

2000grad · 03-08-2013, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReadR00ster

the top of Clowney's helmet hit Smith's facemask.

No way. He just got drilled. I just re-watched it in slow motion from 3 different angles.

Now, unless you take the slant that when Smith go drilled, his chest caved in and caused his helmet to bend down and hit on top of Clowney's then, physically speaking, I can buy that. What I meant was the Clowney, in no way, initiated that hit with his helmet. That was a text book pop and wrap tackle

2000grad · 03-08-2013, 01:16 PM

If a guy leads with his helmet, yes, he should be ejected but I have no problem with them not being allowed a substitute for the ejected player. Dangerous play and all

ReadR00ster · 03-08-2013, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2000grad

No way. He just got drilled. I just re-watched it in slow motion from 3 different angles

The helmet flew like ten yards, use some common sense. That helmet can not do that just by hitting the player. You can't literally knock someone out of their socks. It's been disproven by mythbusters.

ReadR00ster · 03-08-2013, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2000grad

If a guy leads with his helmet, yes, he should be ejected but I have no problem with them not being allowed a substitute for the ejected player. Dangerous play and all

Not being allowed substitute for the ejected player? What does that mean 10 on 11 football like in soccer? I hope not, because that would really stupid.

StretfordEnd · 03-08-2013, 01:24 PM

Treating an ejection in football like a red card in soccer. Interesting.

2000grad · 03-08-2013, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReadR00ster

The helmet flew like ten yards, use some common sense. That helmet can not do that just by hitting the player. You can't literally knock someone out of their socks. It's been disproven by mythbusters.

I reckon you didn't read the rest of my post. Use some common sense...eyes rolling...

Who is talking about knocking someone out of their shoes??? Good grief. Use some common sense...

2000grad · 03-08-2013, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReadR00ster

Not being allowed substitute for the ejected player? What does that mean 10 on 11 football like in soccer? I hope not, because that would really stupid.

Why?

Today's Top 10
Posters (by posts)	Threads (by views)	Newest Posts	Gamecock Headlines
RGHoskins wncmountaincock FearThethumbandDJ garnet_black215 Captain9Dragons trapper82 GotSpurrier82 spareparts 75CarolinaFan GamecockMomSC	screw pandora (602) I-5 bridge collapses (534) Gamecocks Divisional (495) People at work (437) 8 years on CockyTalk (413) Mustard (378) Official Post Spring (315) Eyebrows (213) Jamaica Food Post (193) Strategy for child's (176)	Former Quarterbacks 2015 - Mason Veal 2013 Atlanta Braves Seaso 2013 SEC Tournament:**USC Sporting News says Cocks UFC 160: Velasquez vs Big 2015 - Albert Huggins Certain Nebraska City Pos 2013 NBA Playoffs Thread Gamecocks Divisional Reco

03-08-2013, 09:02 AM	#1
ColaCock Heisman Candidate Male Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Tampa Posts: 17,383 CockyCash: 200	NCAA: Hit Defenseless Player Above Shoulders, Ejection. Plus a 15 yard penalty. Now, I am all for player safety. However, this past season proved that the referees are not able to accurately call this penalty correctly. We are going to rely on this same judgment for the ejection of a player from a game? Totally the wrong way to handle it. __________________

03-08-2013, 09:08 AM	#2
davidmc467 Little Engine That Could Male Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Chapin, SC Posts: 3,199 CockyCash: 500	Re: NCAA: Hit Defenseless Player Above Shoulders, Ejection. The refs are able to use instant replay to review the ejection. It is still a stupid rule, but at least they put the review in it. __________________

03-08-2013, 09:11 AM	#3
usc1 Class of 2013 Male Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Columbia Posts: 15,999 CockyCash: 100087355	Re: NCAA: Hit Defenseless Player Above Shoulders, Ejection. I don't think I can trust then even with the review. __________________

03-08-2013, 12:02 PM	#4
uscsandstorm85 Starter Male Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Anywhere USC is playing. Posts: 1,441 CockyCash: 500	Re: NCAA: Hit Defenseless Player Above Shoulders, Ejection. Instant replay will not increase the accuracy. This rule needs a solid line that the refs have to go by when making a decision. The problem with this rule is every ref has a different view of what's above the shoulders, leading with the helmet, what constitutes a defenseless player, ect. While they have guidelines about those situations, there is still to much room for personal perception of what happened. __________________ "I don't know. I sort of always liked playing them that second game because you could always count on them having two or three key players suspended."-S. Spurrier on scheduling changes in the sec.

03-08-2013, 12:19 PM	#5
ReadR00ster 1st Team All-SEC Male Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: St. Petersburg, FL Posts: 3,591 CockyCash: 250075	Re: NCAA: Hit Defenseless Player Above Shoulders, Ejection. I don't think it's fair that they don't take into account that the defender might be a lot taller than "defenseless" offensive player, like Clowney and Vincent Smith (albeit not a defenseless player in that case.)

03-08-2013, 12:46 PM	#7
FanofCarolina1 1st Team All-American Male Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kingsland, Ga. Posts: 10,033 CockyCash: 200	Re: NCAA: Hit Defenseless Player Above Shoulders, Ejection. I still can't believe the hit on Cunningham in the Vandy game, yet that guy wasn't ejected. But DJ's hit caused him to be ejected. Maybe the instant replay on this will be a good thing. We'll see. __________________

03-08-2013, 12:47 PM	#8
BornCocky'86 Good...Great Male Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Columbia, SC Posts: 1,821 CockyCash: 283	Re: NCAA: Hit Defenseless Player Above Shoulders, Ejection. The game we love is slowly fading away. Only on the most egregious plays should ejections occur Seriously, c'mon man. __________________ "I think maybe we should just sit here quietly now and not say anything, and let you just kinda contemplate on the news I just dropped on you, and let me just kinda contemplate on my own pain and sorrows right now." Kenny Powers

03-08-2013, 12:56 PM	#9
StretfordEnd I got a choppa in the car Male Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Maryville, TN Posts: 153 CockyCash: 500	Re: NCAA: Hit Defenseless Player Above Shoulders, Ejection. The rule and the penalty are both stupid.

03-08-2013, 01:07 PM	#13
usc90grad Cum Laude Cock Male Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Waxhaw, NC Posts: 38,378 CockyCash: 1880	Re: NCAA: Hit Defenseless Player Above Shoulders, Ejection. Going to ruin the game like the NFL is. __________________

03-08-2013, 01:16 PM	#15
2000grad Unofficial WDW Expert Male Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: SC Posts: 16,436 CockyCash: 1000468	Re: NCAA: Hit Defenseless Player Above Shoulders, Ejection. If a guy leads with his helmet, yes, he should be ejected but I have no problem with them not being allowed a substitute for the ejected player. Dangerous play and all __________________ BLOG

03-08-2013, 01:24 PM	#18
StretfordEnd I got a choppa in the car Male Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Maryville, TN Posts: 153 CockyCash: 500	Re: NCAA: Hit Defenseless Player Above Shoulders, Ejection. Treating an ejection in football like a red card in soccer. Interesting.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode